MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020462214 · doi:10.1080/10428194.2020.1749607

Healthcare resource utilization in myeloproliferative neoplasms: a population-based study from Ontario, Canada

2020· article· en· W3020462214 on OpenAlexaffabout
Aniket Bankar, Haoyu Zhao, Javaid Iqbal, Ruth Coxford, Matthew C. Cheung, Lee Mozessohn, Craig C. Earle, Vikas Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueLeukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreHealth Sciences CentreEntomological Society of CanadaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePolycythemia veraMyelofibrosisPopulationCohortHealth careComorbidityVenous thrombosisInternal medicineEssential thrombocythemiaThrombosisEmergency medicineSurgeryEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Health resource utilization (HRU) and associated factors of high cost are not well understood in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). In this population-based, retrospective matched-cohort study, we used administrative health databases of Ontario, Canada to measure treatment costs and HRU for patients with MPN from 2004 to 2016 and compared them to matched controls. In 7130 patients with MPN [essential thrombocythemia (ET) = 3481; polycythemia vera (PV) = 2618; myelofibrosis (MF) = 1031], the mean annualized treatment costs were $16,646 for ET (controls, $7070); $16,360 for PV (controls, $7293); and $25,863 for MF (controls, $7386). Out of the total costs, the largest expenditure was on acute hospital care (ET: 57%, PV: 57%, MF: 66%). Older age (≥65), male gender, patients not seen by a specialist, and greater comorbidity burden were independent predictors of higher costs (p < 0.05). In addition, history of venous thrombosis in patients with ET and PV was associated with significantly higher treatment costs (p < 0.05).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLeukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphomaSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207