MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020549889 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2020.2987982

Transmission Expansion Planning Including TCSCs and SFCLs: A MINLP Approach

2020· article· en· W3020549889 on OpenAlexafffund
Masoud Esmaili, Mohammad Ghamsari‐Yazdel, Nima Amjady, C. Y. Chung, Antonio J. Conejo

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLinearizationSizingMathematical optimizationTransmission lineElectric power transmissionTransmission (telecommunications)Nonlinear programmingBenders' decompositionThyristorComputer scienceNonlinear systemEngineeringVoltageMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a transmission expansion planning model that integrates thyristor-controlled series compensators (TCSCs) to enhance line transmission capacity, and superconducting fault current limiters (SFCLs) to control short-circuit levels. The harmonious interplay between TCSCs and SFCLs results in effective and economically attractive optimal expansion plans. This multi-stage planning model translates into a complex mixed-integer nonlinear programming problem, which is hard to solve. To solve it, we propose a successive linearization technique within a Benders' decomposition scheme that proves effective in finding optimal solutions and efficient in terms of computational burden. We illustrate the methodology proposed using the IEEE 39-bus system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power SystemsSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207