MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020549889 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2020.2987982

Transmission Expansion Planning Including TCSCs and SFCLs: A MINLP Approach

2020· article· en· W3020549889 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLinearizationSizingMathematical optimizationTransmission lineElectric power transmissionTransmission (telecommunications)Nonlinear programmingBenders' decompositionThyristorComputer scienceNonlinear systemEngineeringVoltageMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a transmission expansion planning model that integrates thyristor-controlled series compensators (TCSCs) to enhance line transmission capacity, and superconducting fault current limiters (SFCLs) to control short-circuit levels. The harmonious interplay between TCSCs and SFCLs results in effective and economically attractive optimal expansion plans. This multi-stage planning model translates into a complex mixed-integer nonlinear programming problem, which is hard to solve. To solve it, we propose a successive linearization technique within a Benders' decomposition scheme that proves effective in finding optimal solutions and efficient in terms of computational burden. We illustrate the methodology proposed using the IEEE 39-bus system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it