MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020554662 · doi:10.14740/jh596

Prolonged Remission by Pembrolizumab and Brentuximab-Vedotin Combination Therapy in Heavily-Pretreated Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

2020· article· en· W3020554662 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tsung-Ying Yu, Ming‐Shen Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrentuximab vedotinPembrolizumabMedicineOncologyInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)LymphomaChemotherapyImmunotherapyHodgkin lymphomaCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is usually sensitive and curative to multi-agent chemotherapy, but may become refractory disease in a subset of relapsed patients. Recent novel agents, brentuximab-vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improve the treatment outcome. We report the outcome by combination of BV with pembrolizumab in a patient with a relapsed/refractory HL in a remarkable and durable response, even previously failed to multiple lines of chemotherapy, or brentuximab-vedotin/pembrolizumab monotherapy. Further investigation of immunotherapy combination in relapsed/refractory HL is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HematologySame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207