MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A 12.5mg mm-Scale Inductively-Powered Light-Directivity-Enhanced Highly-Linear Bidirectional Optogenetic Neuro-Stimulator

2020· article· en· W3020647924 on OpenAlexaff
Tayebeh Yousefi, Mansour Taghadosi, Alireza Dabbaghian, Ryan Siu, Gerd Grau, Georg Zoidi, Hossein Kassiri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOptogeneticsDirectivityComputer scienceElectromagnetic coilElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design, development, and experimental validation of a mm-scale self-contained bidirectional optogenetic stimulator are presented. A novel current-mode LED driving circuit architecture is employed that allows for fully-linear control of optical stimulation up to ILED=10mA, with the smallest reported 200mV headroom, significantly boosting the electrical-to-optical energy conversion efficiency. The system's energy efficiency is further improved by inkjet printing of custom-designed optical μlenses on top of the device to enhance the generated light directivity. Our results show a 30.46× irradiance (optical power per area) improvement for the same electrical power consumption. In addition to the two stimulation channels, the SoC integrates two recording channels for LFP recording and digitization, and is powered through an on-chip coil with PTE=2.24%. Full experimental SoC electrical and optical characterization and in vitro measurement results are reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207