Bibliographic record
Abstract
La salud uno de los componentes más importantes del proceso de desarrollo de un país en tanto implica, alcanzar el máximo desarrollo posible del ser humano para transformarse y lograr su máximo bienestar. Se plantea la necesidad de promover políticas y prácticas sociales relacionadas con la Promoción de la Salud,los estilos de vida saludable, representa una de las estrategias de intervención .Uno de sus componentes son los hábitos alimentarios. A partir de los postulados de la Carta de Ottawa, la salud se constituye en un sector prioritario, sustentado en una perspectiva ontológica que proyecta como estrategia cambiar los estilos de vida, en particular los relacionados, con hábitos alimentarios. El medio para lograrlo.es la teoría Salutogénica a través de los recursos de resistencia general desde un enfoque, para focalizar y ver las acciones de las personas por una salud positiva. Se proyecta considerar las categorías conceptuales esenciales de Promoción de la salud, en relación a estilos de vida saludables y hábitos alimentarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".