MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A PESSOA JURÍDICA COMO SUJEITO DE DIREITOS HUMANOS

2019· article· pt· W3020798370 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Jurídica · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsOpen Text (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanismHuman rightsHumanitiesSubject (documents)Political scienceFundamental rightsPhilosophyLaw and economicsSociologyLawComputer scienceLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RESUMOO presente texto pretende estabelecer que a pessoa jurídica, em suas distintas expressões, pode e deve ser considerada como sujeito de direitos humanos. Analisando distintas posições relacionais busca demonstrar o distinto status jurídico que, tanto em perspectiva substancial quanto processual, pode ter reconhecidos pelas instancias administrativa e jurisdicional como titulares de certos direitos e como destinatárias da proteção jurídica inerente aos direitos humanos.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Sujeito de Direito; Pessoa; Pessoa Jurídica; Direitos Humanos; Capitalismo Humanista; Direito Quântico.ABSTRACT The present text intends to establish that the juridical person, in its different expressions, can and should be considered as subject of human rights. Analyzing different relational positions, it seeks to demonstrate the distinct legal status that, bothin a substantive and procedural perspective, can be recognized by the administrative and jurisdictional instances as holders of certain rights and as recipient of the legal protection inherent in human rights. KEYWORDS: Subject of law; person; legal person; Human Rights; Humanist Capitalism; Quantum Law.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it