A PESSOA JURÍDICA COMO SUJEITO DE DIREITOS HUMANOS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMOO presente texto pretende estabelecer que a pessoa jurídica, em suas distintas expressões, pode e deve ser considerada como sujeito de direitos humanos. Analisando distintas posições relacionais busca demonstrar o distinto status jurídico que, tanto em perspectiva substancial quanto processual, pode ter reconhecidos pelas instancias administrativa e jurisdicional como titulares de certos direitos e como destinatárias da proteção jurídica inerente aos direitos humanos.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Sujeito de Direito; Pessoa; Pessoa Jurídica; Direitos Humanos; Capitalismo Humanista; Direito Quântico.ABSTRACT The present text intends to establish that the juridical person, in its different expressions, can and should be considered as subject of human rights. Analyzing different relational positions, it seeks to demonstrate the distinct legal status that, bothin a substantive and procedural perspective, can be recognized by the administrative and jurisdictional instances as holders of certain rights and as recipient of the legal protection inherent in human rights. KEYWORDS: Subject of law; person; legal person; Human Rights; Humanist Capitalism; Quantum Law.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".