MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020863344 · doi:10.21083/nrsc.v0i12.5096

« En magie, demander c’est obtenir »

2020· article· fr· W3020863344 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Lucile Mulat

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelle Revue Synergies Canada · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSubversionArtPhilosophyPoliticsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans son dernier roman, Les Sorcières de la République, Chloé Delaume imagine une société où, devenues sorcières après que les déesses de l’Olympe les ont dotées de pouvoirs magiques, les femmes renversent le gouvernement français jugé trop oppressif pour celles-ci et imposent un nouveau régime politique. Si l’intrigue paraît fantasque, le réinvestissement de la figure de la sorcière, incantatrice et jeteuse de sorts, permet de mettre en avant l’idée d’un pouvoir d’action résidant fondamentalement dans la parole. Cet article se propose d’analyser comment cette agentivité discusive se construit précisément dans le texte en observant la parole de la sorcière, de la représentation de son émettrice à l’espace dans lequel sa voix résonne. 
 
 Mots-clés : sorcière, agentivité, pouvoir, parole, Delaume 
 Références 
 Austin, John L. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, 1962. 
 Bras-Chopard (Le), Armelle. Les Putains du Diable : Le procès en sorcellerie des femmes. Plon, 2006. 
 Bechtel, Guy, Les quatre femmes de Dieu : La putain, la sorcière, la sainte & Bécassine. Plon, 2000. 
 Butler, Judith. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. Routledge, 1997. 
 ---. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, 1990. 
 Delaume, Chloé. Les Sorcières de la République. Seuil, 2016. 
 ---. Mes biens chères sœurs. Seuil, 2019. 
 Despentes, Virginie. King Kong théorie. Grasset & Fasquelle, « Le livre de poche », 2007. 
 Federici, Silvia, Caliban et la Sorcière : femmes, corps et accumulation primitive. Traduit par le collectif Senonevero, Entremonde/Senonevero, 2014. 
 Gardiner, Judith Kegan, éditrice. Provoking Agents: Gender and Agency in Theory and Practice. University of Illinois Press, 1995. 
 Havercroft, Barbara. « Quand écrire, c'est agir : stratégies narratives d'agentivité féministe dans Jounal pour mémoire de France Théoret. » Dalhousie French Studies, vol. 47, Summer 1999, pp. 93-113. 
 Hekman, Susan. “Subjects and Agents: The question for Feminism.” Provoking Agents: Gender and Agency in Theory and Practice, édité par Judith Kegan Gardiner, University of Illinois Press, 1995, pp. 94-207. 
 Michelet, Jules. La Sorcière. 1862. M. Didier, 1952-56. 
 Rose, Gillian. Feminism & Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Polity Press, 1993.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelle Revue Synergies CanadaSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207