A comparison of anamorphs of some<i> Pachyphlodes </i> species and the type of<i> Chromelosporium: </i> are they congeneric?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a question of whether or not the name Chromelosporium competes with the name Pachyphlodes given that both genera exhibit similar conidiogenesis. We address here the question through a comparative study of their anamorphs. The type specimen of C. ochraceum (generic type of Chromelosporium ), has been studied and compared to newly collected specimens of two Pachyphlodes species, P. nemoralis and P. citrina (whose identity was confirmed through comparison of ITS DNA sequences) and an unidentified species from the Pachyphlodes–Plicariella lineage. Comparison of the morphology of the Pachyphlodes–Plicariella lineage anamorphs with Chromelosporium ochraceum reveals discriminating characters that may support a generic distinction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it