MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020906586 · doi:10.21742/ijiphm.2020.7.1.04

An Overview of Healthcare Interoperability through NODE-RED Workflows

2020· article· en· W3020906586 on OpenAlexaff
Jinan Fiaidhi, Sabah Mohammed, Sami Mohammed

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of IT-based Public Health Management · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Process Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkflowInteroperabilityComputer scienceAnalyticsHealth careNode (physics)Data scienceElectronic health recordSoftware engineeringWorld Wide WebDatabaseEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) systems from aren't designed to meet the increasingly broad and complex enterprise wide analytics as well as to interact with other systems. As a result, clinicians have a hard time leveraging the information they need to improve patient care. This article overviews the authors efforts to prototype the new generations of clinical systems by incorporating clinical workflow frameworks like Node-Red and integrating the dynamic of this integration and the changes that may occur upon these clinical workflows using an extended JDL model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of IT-based Public Health ManagementSame topicBusiness Process Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207