MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020915540 · doi:10.35410/ijaeb.2020.5497

FLORISTIC AND FAUNA INVENTORY OF THE ECOLOGICAL SITE OF THE OUESSE CROCODILE POND FOR ECO-TOURISM DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF SAVALOU-BENIN

2020· article· en· W3020915540 on OpenAlexaff
Louis DJEGBATE, Alain ZINGONGO, Norbert AGOINON, José Edgard Gnele, Odile GUEDEGBE DOSSOU

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Agriculture Environment and Bioresearch · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAfrican Botany and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrocodileGeographyFloristicsFaunaTourismEcotourismEcologyEnvironmental protectionForestryArchaeologyBiologySpecies richness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of this study is to inventory the fauna and flora of the crocodile pond in order to come up with development proposals for ecological and ecotourism restoration of the ecosystem. To achieve this objective, two field phases were carried out respectively in April and October 2018 for one week at each descent. This provision made it possible to take into account the temporal and/or seasonal dimension of the dynamics of the biological resources in place. The wildlife inventory was carried out on the basis of direct and indirect observations during the day and at night, supplemented by trapping captures. Night and day mounts were made. Crocodiles, endemic to the pond, have been the subject of an in-depth study of their habitat and ecology in the environment. The floristic inventory was carried out through vegetation surveys both inside and outside plots. Semi-structured individual and group interviews were conducted with local populations, authorities and local government officials in order to take into account the interests of the various stakeholders in the development proposals. A total of nine (09) mammal species, twenty (20) bird species, one (01) fish species, one (01) crustacean species and five (05) amphibian species were inventoried on all three (03) pools during the field phase of this study. The vegetation of the ponds and its associated areas include about thirty woody species divided into sixteen ( The most dominant families are those of Moraceae (04 species) including the genus Ficus, followed by Mimosaceae, Sapindaceae represented by three species each. The other families are at most represented by two species. The ecological restoration of the crocodile pond must involve enriching the food chain and maintaining it through periodic stocking with catfish and tilapia. Two platforms are to be built on the pond and banks using locally collected stone paving stones to improve crocodile sightings by tourists. In the same way, an internal ecotourism tour will be planned and visit contents developed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Agriculture Environment and BioresearchSame topicAfrican Botany and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207