MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hiccups: A Non-Systematic Review

2020· review· en· W3020928103 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander K. C. Leung, Amy A.M. Leung, Alex H.C. Wong, Kam‐Lun Ellis Hon

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Pediatric Reviews · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPathogenesis and Treatment of Hiccups
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHiccupsMedicineEtiologyIntensive care medicineRandomized controlled trialNarrative reviewClinical trialGastroparesisPediatricsSurgeryPsychiatryInternal medicineStomach

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Hiccups are a universal phenomenon. They are usually benign and selflimited. Persistent or intractable hiccups, although rare, can be debilitating and may indicate the presence of an underlying pathological process. OBJECTIVE: To familiarize physicians with the pathophysiology, etiology, evaluation, and management of children with hiccups. METHODS: A search was conducted on December 10, 2019, in Pubmed Clinical Queries using the key terms "hiccup" OR "hiccough" OR "singultus". The selected publication types included all clinical trials (including open trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and randomized controlled trials), observational studies, and reviews (including meta-analysis and narrative reviews) published within the past 10 years. Only papers published in the English literature were included in this review. The information retrieved from the above search was used in the compilation of the present article. RESULTS: Overdistension of the stomach is the most commonly identifiable cause of acute hiccups, followed by gastroesophageal reflux and gastritis. Other causes of hiccups, notably persistent and intractable hiccups, include an underlying gastrointestinal, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary, infectious, and psychogenic disorder. Persistent or intractable hiccups can be a harbinger of serious medical pathology. A detailed history and thorough physical examination may provide clues for the etiology of the hiccups. The treatment of hiccups should be directed at the underlying cause whenever possible. Bouts of acute hiccups less than 48 hours rarely require medical intervention as they usually resolve within minutes. Treatment may be considered when hiccups are bothersome, persistent, or intractable. Treatment modalities include lifestyle changes, physical maneuvers, pharmacotherapy and, very rarely, surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Acute hiccups are usually benign and self-limiting. Persistent or intractable hiccups can be a harbinger of serious medical pathology. The underlying cause should be treated if possible. There are no formal guidelines for the treatment of hiccups. Currently, most of the methods proposed are based on case reports and anecdotal evidence. Terminating an episode of hiccups can be very challenging for a clinician but may tremendously improve the patient's quality of life. It is hoped that future well-designed and better-powered studies will provide us with more information on the efficacy of various treatment modalities for hiccups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.009
Bibliometrics0.0160.016
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Pediatric ReviewsSame topicPathogenesis and Treatment of HiccupsFrench-language works237,207