MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020934150 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2991744

Simplified Fourier Series Based Transistor Open-Circuit Fault Location Method in Voltage-Source Inverter Fed Induction Motor

2020· article· en· W3020934150 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Wu, Jianwen Sun, Dehong Zhou, Yang Liu, Tao Geng, Jin Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFourier seriesHarmonicsComputer scienceTransistorRippleInverterFault (geology)VoltageElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transistors in three-phase voltage-source inverter often suffer from open-circuit failures due to the lifting of bonding wires caused by thermic cycling, resulting in performance degradation with ripple torque and current harmonics. Current-spectral-analysis based methods are widely applied to failure diagnosis; however, high calculation consumption and complex implementation limit their application in some real-time occasion. In this paper, a simplified Fourier series method is proposed by the product between reconstructed phase currents and reference signals. Meanwhile, a novel normalized method for DC and fundamental components of simplified Fourier series are proposed to locate twenty-one transistor open-circuit faults. Numerical results show that the proposed Fourier series method coincides with that of Fast Fourier Transform. Experimental results and the comparison with previous methods show high efficiency and merits of its application to transistor open-circuit fault location in the voltage-source inverter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207