MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Molecular Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors by Somatostatin-Receptor Scintigraphy (SPECT/CT) with 99mTc-Tektrotyd

2020· article· en· W3020937146 on OpenAlexaff
Константин Юрьевич Слащук, P. O. Rumyantsev, M. V. Degtyarev, Сергей Сергеевич Серженко, O. D. Baranova, А. А. Трухин, Ya. Sirota

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Radiology and radiation safety · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsNational Defence Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSomatostatin receptorNeuroendocrine tumorsSomatostatinScintigraphyNuclear medicineMedicineStage (stratigraphy)RadiologyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms constituting about 0.5 % of all cancer cases. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the incidence of NETs, which is primarily due to the active development and improvement of medical imaging technologies. Successful treatment and prognosis for patients with NETs strongly depend on the stage of the disease. One of the effective methods of visualization and staging NETs in nuclear medicine is somatostin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), which is based on the use of partial somatostatin receptor agonists labeled with radioactive isotopes. The article presents an analysis of 55 patients with NETs of various localizations who underwent scintigraphy and SPECT/CT. Radiopharmaceutical was used as a tracer for SRS. It was prepared on the basis of a lyophilisate developed by Polatom (Poland) — Tektrotyd, labeled with 99mTc. According to the results of the study SRS with 99mTc-Tektrotyd is informative in the topical diagnosis of NETs, especially when PET/CT scan with 68Ga-labeled peptides is not available. Sensitivity varies depending on the NET localization. It is necessary to continue researches on the diagnostic value of SRS with 99mTc-Tektrotyd for tumors, in the pathogenesis of which somatostatin receptors play a significant role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Radiology and radiation safetySame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207