MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021015072 · doi:10.3968/11662

An Analysis on the Research-oriented Teaching Mode of Flipped Classroom Based on the Curriculum of International Service Trade

2020· article· en· W3021015072 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Li Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher education of social science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatus quoCurriculumFlipped classroomClass (philosophy)Mathematics educationProcess (computing)Computer scienceService (business)Mode (computer interface)PedagogyPsychologyBusinessPolitical scienceMarketingHuman–computer interactionArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The curriculum of International Service Trade is of great practical use and it is therefore not recommended to adopt the traditional teaching method of one-way communication in the teaching process. As a result, it has become the most prominent problem for the faculties to solve on the innovation of the research-oriented teaching mode based on service trade. Among the solutions, the application of flipped classroom has greatly facilitated the teaching efficiency of service trade. On top of it, this paper analyzes the process and status quo of the curriculum of service trade based on the research-oriented teaching mode of flipped classroom, and puts forward specific strategies from the aspects of improving the proficiency of pre-class preparation, quality of in-class teaching as well as the effect of after-class reinforcement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigher education of social scienceSame topicInnovative Teaching MethodsFrench-language works237,207