MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

12 – Culinary Applications

2006· article· en· W3021032235 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dimitrios Boskou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicEdible Oils Quality and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlive oilFood scienceFlavorMediterranean climateBrineFish <Actinopterygii>GeographyAgricultural scienceEnvironmental scienceBiologyChemistryFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Publisher Summary This chapter describes that olive oil, a food staple in the warmer regions around the Mediterranean Sea, is now becoming popular throughout Europe and in the United States, Canada, and other countries. This is due to its highly characteristic flavor but also to the promotion of the health benefits of Mediterranean dietary patterns. Olive oil contributes complex flavors that are reflected throughout the whole dish and adds body and depth to food. A good quality olive oil blends perfectly with the greens. Traditional vegetable dishes are prepared with seasonal vegetables, pulses, and grains. Although very old, these recipes contain wisely balanced ingredients and meet health criteria as defined by modern science. In addition to salads and cooking, olive oil is also used in marinades, pasta sauces, for preserving fish, cheese, sausage, and vegetables, for the preparation of breakfast toasts (tostada con aceite), as a dip for bread and in sweets, savory dishes, and home bread. The International Olive Oil Council in its Trade Standards (COI/T.15/NC no 325,2003) defined three positive attributes: bitter, fruity, and pungent and 11 negative attributes: fusty, musty, muddy, sediment winey-vinegary, rancid, heated or burnt, hay or woody, greasy, vegetable water, brine, and earthy regarding olive oil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5230.346

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEdible Oils Quality and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207