MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021101506 · doi:10.4064/cm124-2-5

A quantitative aspect of non-unique factorizations: the Narkiewicz constants II

2011· article· en· W3021101506 on OpenAlexafffund
Weidong Gao, Yuanlin Li, Jiangtao Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueColloquium Mathematicum · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMeromorphic and Entire Functions
Canadian institutionsBrock University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCivil Aviation University of China
KeywordsMathematicsRing of integersBounded functionAlgebraic numberRing (chemistry)Algebraic number fieldClass (philosophy)Class numberZero (linguistics)Norm (philosophy)Field (mathematics)CombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $K$ be an algebraic number field with non-trivial class group $G$ and $\mathcal O_K$ be its ring of integers. For $k \in \mathbb N$ and some real $x \ge 1$, let $F_k (x)$ denote the number of non-zero principal ideals $a\mathcal O_K$ with norm bounded

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.013
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueColloquium MathematicumSame topicMeromorphic and Entire FunctionsFrench-language works237,207