MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021129313 · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2020.04.009

Single-Cell Analysis of Human Retina Identifies Evolutionarily Conserved and Species-Specific Mechanisms Controlling Development

2020· article· en· W3021129313 on OpenAlexafffund
Yufeng Lu, Fion Shiau, Wenyang Yi, Suying Lü, Qian Wu, Joel D. Pearson, Alyssa Kallman, Suijuan Zhong, Thanh Hoang, Zhentao Zuo, Fangqi Zhao, Mei Zhang, Nicole Tsai, Yan Zhuo, Sheng He, Jun Zhang, Genevieve Stein-O’Brien, Thomas D. Sherman, Xin Duan, Elana J. Fertig, Loyal A. Goff, Donald J. Zack, James T. Handa, Tian Xue, Rod Bremner, Seth Blackshaw, Xiaoqun Wang, Brian S. Clark

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Cell · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Science Fund for Distinguished Young ScholarsNational Eye InstituteNational Cancer InstituteNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchBeijing Municipal Science and Technology CommissionChinese Academy of SciencesResearch to Prevent BlindnessNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaKrembil FoundationChina National Funds for Distinguished Young ScientistsJohns Hopkins University
KeywordsBiologyRetinaCell biologyEvolutionary biologyConserved sequenceCellComputational biologyGeneticsGeneBase sequenceNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations307
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental CellSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207