MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021130059 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.150210

Towards Efficient Green Architecture and Sustainable Facades Using Novel Brick Design

2020· article· en· W3021130059 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zaid A.O. Aldeek

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainable designArchitectural engineeringArchitectureEngineeringBrickArchitectural designCivil engineeringSustainabilityGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most influential element in green architecture is the facade since it represents the major expression of architecture and separates the internal micro-climate and external environment.This paper focuses on the design of new types of interactive facades, developing new typologies, such as an interactive facade that aims to reduce air pollution among a system of facades that allows micro, non-irrigated vertical vegetation development, absorption, and fixing of micro particles through inspiration process.The interactive green facade uses special bricks designed to permit an inspiration and aspiration process caused by different temperature and humidity levels, which, in turn, promotes the growth of micro-vegetations.Both elements help to reduce air pollution and could be used separately or together.The facade obtained with this method introduces an innovative concept of green facades and helps to reduce carbon and other oxides that cause global warming.The scope of this research is to produce high performance facades that are conceptually based on simplified and advanced technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207