MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3021169347 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2000148117

Influence of spatially segregated IP <sub>3</sub> -producing pathways on spike generation and transmitter release in Purkinje cell axons

2020· article· en· W3021169347 on OpenAlexaff
Laura C Gomez, Shin‐ya Kawaguchi, Thibault Collin, Abdelali Jalil, María del Pilar Gómez, Enrico Nasi, Alain Marty, Isabel Llano

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFP7 Ideas: European Research Council
KeywordsNeuroscienceBiologyAxonPurinergic receptorReceptorInositol trisphosphateCell biologyNeurotransmitter receptorNeurotransmitterInositolBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance IP 3 receptors are well-documented regulators of intracellular calcium concentration, but their role in axons of central neurons remains unexplored. Here we show that IP 3 receptors are present throughout the axon of cerebellar Purkinje cells where their activation leads to calcium release from intracellular stores. We reveal distinct, sharply delimited signaling cascades leading to IP 3 production in the axon initial segment (AIS), in the more distal part of the axon, and in synaptic terminals. In the AIS, IP 3 -induced calcium rises inhibit action potential generation, whereas similar signals in axonal terminals increase transmitter release. Metabotropic purinergic receptors appear to control the IP 3 -driven cascade. Altogether, the results reveal potent actions of IP 3 in central axons, which are both diverse and spatially constrained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→