Features of inclined magnetohydrodynamics on a second‐grade fluid impinging on vertical stretching cylinder with suction and Newtonian heating
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present work concentrates on two‐dimensional steady incompressible mixed convection flow of a second‐grade fluid past a vertical cylinder with the inclined magnetic field. The Newtonian heating with suction is incorporated into this study. Simulation is conducted via Runge–Kutta‐4 with a shooting method for the transformed system of nonlinear equations. The influence of the governing parameters on the dimensionless velocity, temperature, skin friction, heat transfer rate, and finally streamlines and isotherms is incorporated. The significant outcomes of the current investigation are that increment in suction parameter uplifts temperature while it peters out the velocity field. Another important outcome of the present analysis is that velocity augments due to an increment in the second‐grade parameter while it reduces the temperature. The fluid temperature is grown due to the strengthening of Biot number, magnetic parameter, and Eckert number while that peter out due to incremental mixed convection parameter. Furthermore, it is also noticed that the Nusselt number escalated with the enhancement of the second‐grade parameter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".