MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021195429 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2990925

Joint Relay Assignment and Power Allocation for Multiuser Multirelay Networks Over Underwater Wireless Optical Channels

2020· article· en· W3021195429 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceRelayMathematical optimizationBisection methodOptimization problemResource allocationAssignment problemTransmitter power outputComputer networkPower (physics)Channel (broadcasting)AlgorithmTransmitterMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiuser multirelay network is a potential scenario to fulfill the transmission requirements of various sources and high-volume traffic for the Internet of Underwater Things. To efficiently complete concurrent transmissions for multiple users, this article investigates the joint relay assignment and power allocation problem for multiuser multirelay networks based on the underwater optical wireless communication (UOWC). Specifically, the multiuser multirelay network for UOWC based on decode-and-forward relaying is modeled, where the absorption, scattering, solar radiation noise, and oceanic turbulence of UOWC are all considered. The joint optimization problem of relay assignment and power allocation is formulated as a mixed-integer programming problem, where the average outage probability is minimized with the constraint of total transmitted power. To solve this joint problem, an alternating optimization method is employed, which alternately optimizes the relay assignment and power allocation subproblems. The relay assignment subproblem is modeled as a weighted bipartite matching problem and solved by an improved Kuhn-Munkres algorithm, whereas the power allocation subproblem is proved to be quasiconvex and solved by an iterative bisection algorithm. The simulation results indicate that the proposed schemes significantly reduce the average outage probability with fast convergence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it