MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021256567 · doi:10.3390/math8050681

A Decentralized Framework for Parameter and State Estimation of Infiltration Processes

2020· article· en· W3021256567 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRichards equationInfiltration (HVAC)Vadose zoneEstimationComputer scienceEstimation theoryField (mathematics)Applied mathematicsWork (physics)State (computer science)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsSoil scienceEnvironmental scienceSoil waterAlgorithmEngineeringMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Richards’ equation is widely used in the modeling soil water dynamics driven by the capillary and gravitational forces in the vadose zone. Its state and parameter estimation based on field soil moisture measurements is important and challenging for field applications of the Richards’ equation. In this work, we consider simultaneous state and parameter estimation of systems described by the three dimensional Richards’ equation with multiple types of soil. Based on a study on the interaction between subsystems, we propose to use decentralized estimation schemes to reduce the complexity of the estimation problem. Guidelines for subsystem decomposition are discussed and a decentralized estimation scheme developed in the framework of moving horizon state estimation is proposed. Extensive simulation results are presented to show the performance of the proposed decentralized approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it