MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021437377 · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.309

P141 Factors associated with HIV-related stigma among individuals accessing antiretroviral therapy in british columbia, canada

2019· article· en· W3021437377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal HealthAIDS Vancouver
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStigma (botany)MedicineEthnic groupCohortPublic healthHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Antiretroviral therapyDemographyCross-sectional studyCohort studyPsychiatryGerontologyFamily medicineViral loadInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Despite public health messaging that antiretroviral therapy (ART) has improved health outcomes for people living with HIV (PLWH) and is effective in preventing HIV transmission, many PLWH continue to experience HIV-related stigma. It is critical to assess HIV-related stigma experienced by PLWH accessing ART in the modern HIV treatment era. <h3>Methods</h3> The STOP HIV/AIDS Program Evaluation (SHAPE) study is a longitudinal cohort of PLWH ≥19 years of age in British Columbia, Canada. This cross-sectional analysis uses SHAPE baseline survey data (collected January 2016-August 2018) and linked clinical registry data to examine factors associated with HIV-related stigma among individuals accessing ART. HIV-related stigma was self-reported using the ten-item Berger HIV stigma scale. Multivariable linear regression quantified the relationship between key explanatory variables and stigma. <h3>Results</h3> Among 627 participants, 136(22%) identified as women, 326(52%) were aged ≥50 at enrolment, 374(60%) identified as men who have sex with men, and 133(21%) self-reported Indigenous ethnicity. The median stigma score was 47.5 (Q1-Q3: 32.5-62.5; range: 0-100). In the multivariable model, reporting injection drug use (IDU) in the past year (β=4.54, 95%CI= 0.23,8.86) or selecting prefer not to answer when asked about IDU history (β=9.52, 95%CI= 4.77,14.28); experiences of lifetime violence (β=7.62, 95%CI= 3.67,11.56); and having a mental health disorder diagnosis (β=5.30, 95%CI= 1.88, 8.73) were associated with higher stigma scores. Higher stigma scores were also associated with being 40-49 years old (β= 6.21, 95%CI= 1.58,10.85) compared to &lt;40; age ≥50 had no significant association. Living in a city with a population ≥100,000 (β=-4.66, 95%CI= -8.53,-0.78) was associated with lower stigma scores. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Age, city size, IDU experience, violence, and mental illness were independently associated with HIV-related stigma. These findings provide support for an intersectional investigation into how these factors propagate stigma and how this experience impacts the health and wellbeing of PLWH in this setting. <h3>Disclosure</h3> No significant relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it