MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021534448 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvaa046.180

SAT-672 An Unusual and Enigmatic Etiology for Diabetic Ketoacidosis: Safety Needles

2020· article· en· W3021534448 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ankur Modi, Keith Cryar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiabetic ketoacidosisMedicineInsulinKetoacidosisDiabetes mellitusType 1 diabetesAnion gapEtiologyInsulin glargineRegular insulinPediatricsInternal medicineSurgeryEndocrinologyAcidosisHypoglycemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Diabetic ketoacidosis is associated with a mortality rate of upto 6.1% and accounts for an estimated 115000 hospital discharges per year in the United States. In order to reduce mortality related to DKA, precipitating causes must be identified and addressed. The most common precipitant for DKA is infection with other precipitating factors including acute illness, medications and inadequate insulin therapy (1). A 76 year-old woman with type 2 diabetes was transferred from her assisted living facility for hyperglycemia. This was her fifth admission in the last month and a half attributed to either hyperglycemia or DKA. Her medications included insulin glargine and insulin aspart. She mentioned compliance with her insulin as well as her diabetic diet. In the ER, her vitals were stable with physical examination showing an obese woman in no acute distress. Her labs showed a blood glucose of 780, an anion gap of 17 and positive serum ketones. Further investigation did not reveal a source of infection or ischemia. The patient was treated in the ICU with intravenous insulin and fluids with resolution of her ketoacidosis. The patient was discharged with a 67% increase in her prandial insulin. On further review, her facility had recently required safety needles to be used for insulin pens. Patient was asked to demonstrate her technique with observation that patient was not pushing down enough to allow for the needle to enter her skin with subsequent trapping of her insulin within the needle. Prior to discharge, she was educated on proper administration of her insulin and since her discharge, she has had no subsequent readmissions for hyperglycemia. Hospitals and long-term facilities are the primary utilizers of needles with a retractable safety shield. Reduction of accidental puncture, elimination of reuse of needles and helping patients overcome anxiety about needles are some of the key advantages of these needles. Upon application of pressure onto the skin, the automatic shield or plastic cannula retracts and thus hides the needle before, during and after the injection. The major disadvantage is insulin being deployed while the needle is outside the body if incorrectly applied. Therefore, appropriate administration must be taught to the patient, including perpendicular insertion of the needle into the subcutaneous tissue and ensuring a more firm surface by injecting into a lifted skin fold. Legislation in the US has been passed requiring safety-engineered devices when feasible.In situations where the safety-engineered devices can impair effectiveness or cause harm, alternative approaches can be utilized, including insulin syringes or self-administration of insulin along with safe work procedures (1). 1. Yu Catherine H.Y.. “Safety” technology: a hidden cause of diabetic ketoacidosis. Canadian Medical Journal Journal. 2012 Mar 20;184(5):557–558.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207