MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021552656 · doi:10.22215/timreview/1342

Editorial: Digitalization and Internationalization

2020· editorial· en· W3021552656 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christophe Schmitt, Rico Baldegger

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology Innovation Management Review · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternationalizationThe artsLibrary sciencePolitical scienceRegional scienceEngineeringEngineering managementEngineering ethicsSociologyBusinessComputer scienceInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Welcome to the April issue of the Technology Innovation Management Review.Digitalization and InternationalizationThe University of Lorraine, France and the School of Management Fribourg (HEG-FR) of the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (HES-SO) have collaborated on research projects and teaching activities for several years now.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.004
Bibliometrics0.0090.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0210.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnology Innovation Management ReviewSame topicBusiness Strategy and InnovationFrench-language works237,207