A mouse model for spinal muscular atrophy provides insights into non-alcoholic fatty liver disease pathogenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background & aims Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an inherited neuromuscular disorder leading to paralysis and death in children. SMA patients are more susceptible to dyslipidemia as well as liver steatosis, features reproduced in SMA mouse models. As current pre-clinical models of NAFLD are invariably imperfect and generally take a long time to develop, the rapid development of liver steatosis in SMA mice provides a means to identify molecular markers of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Here, we investigated whether Smn 2B/- mice, a model of severe SMA, display typical features of NAFLD/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Methods Biochemical, histological, electron microscopy, proteomic, and high-resolution respirometry were used. Results The Smn 2B/- mice develop steatohepatitis early in life. The consequent liver damage arises from mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production and results in impaired hepatic function including alterations in protein output, complement, coagulation, iron homeostasis, and IGF-1 metabolism. The steatohepatitis is reversible by AAV9-SMN gene therapy. The NAFLD phenotype is likely due to non-esterified fatty acid (NEFA) overload from peripheral lipolysis, subsequent to hyperglucagonemia compounded by reduced muscle use. Mitochondrial β-oxidation contributed to hepatic damage as we observed enhanced hepatic mitochondrial β-oxidation and reactive oxygen species production. Hepatic mitochondrial content, however, was decreased. In contrast to typical NAFLD/NASH, the Smn 2B/- mice lose weight due to their neurological condition, develop hypoglycemia and do not develop hepatic fibrosis. Conclusion The Smn 2B/- mice represent a good model of microvesicular steatohepatitis. Like other models, it is not representative of the complete NAFLD/NASH spectrum. Nevertheless, it offers a reliable, low-cost, early onset model that is not dependent on diet to identify molecular players in NAFLD pathogenesis and can serve as one of the very few models of microvesicular steatohepatitis for both adult and pediatric populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".