Deep Reinforcement Learning for Task Offloading in Mobile Edge Computing Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In mobile edge computing systems, an edge node may have a high load when a large number of mobile devices offload their tasks to it. Those offloaded tasks may experience large processing delay or even be dropped when their deadlines expire. Due to the uncertain load dynamics at the edge nodes, it is challenging for each device to determine its offloading decision (i.e., whether to offload or not, and which edge node it should offload its task to) in a decentralized manner. In this work, we consider non-divisible and delay-sensitive tasks as well as edge load dynamics, and formulate a task offloading problem to minimize the expected long-term cost. We propose a model-free deep reinforcement learning-based distributed algorithm, where each device can determine its offloading decision without knowing the task models and offloading decision of other devices. To improve the estimation of the long-term cost in the algorithm, we incorporate the long short-term memory (LSTM), dueling deep Q-network (DQN), and double-DQN techniques. Simulation results with 50 mobile devices and five edge nodes show that the proposed algorithm can reduce the ratio of dropped tasks and average task delay by 86.4%-95.4% and 18.0%-30.1%, respectively, when compared with several existing algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".