MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021809731 · doi:10.1161/circep.120.008625

Ablation of Reentry-Vulnerable Zones Determined by Left Ventricular Activation From Multiple Directions: A Novel Approach for Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

2020· article· en· W3021809731 on OpenAlexaff
Elad Anter, Petr Neužil, Vivek Y. Reddy, Jan Petrů, Kyoung‐Min Park, Jakub Sroubek, Eran Leshem‐Rubinow, Peter Zimetbaum, Alfred E. Buxton, André G. Kléber, Changyu Shen, Andrew L. Wit

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyVentricular tachycardiaInternal medicineAblationReentrySinus rhythmCatheter ablationCoronary sinusTachycardiaBorder zoneMyocardial infarctionAtrial fibrillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The optimal method to identify the arrhythmogenic substrate of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) is unknown. Sites of activation slowing during sinus rhythm (SR) often colocalize with the VT circuit. However, the utility and limitations of such approach for guiding ablation are unknown. Methods: We conducted a multicenter study in patients with infarct-related VT. The left ventricular (LV) was mapped during activation from 3 directions: SR (or atrial pacing), right ventricular, and LV pacing at 600 ms. Ablation was applied selectively to the cumulative area of slow activation, defined as the sum of all regions with activation times of ≥40 ms per 10 mm. Hemodynamically tolerated VTs were mapped with activation or entrainment. The primary outcome was a composite of appropriate implanted cardioverter-defibrillator therapies and cardiovascular death. Results: In 85 patients, the LV was mapped during activation from 2.4±0.6 directions. The direction of LV activation influenced the location and magnitude of activation slowing. The spatial overlap of activation slowing between SR and right ventricular pacing was 84.2±7.1%, between SR and LV pacing was 61.4±8.8%, and between right ventricular and LV pacing was 71.3±9.6% ( P <0.05 between all comparisons). Mapping during SR identified only 66.2±8.2% of the entire area of activation slowing and 58% critical isthmus sites. Activation from other directions by right ventricular and LV stimulation unmasked an additional 33% of slowly conducting zones and 25% critical isthmus sites. The area of maximal activation slowing often corresponded to the site where the wavefront first interacted with the infarct. During a follow-up period of 3.6 years, the primary end point occurred in 14 out of 85 (16.5%) patients. Conclusions: The spatial distribution of activation slowing is dependent on the direction of LV activation with the area of maximal slowing corresponding to the site where the wavefront first interacts with the infarct. This data may have implications for VT substrate mapping strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations76
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Arrhythmia and ElectrophysiologySame topicCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207