MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry Sampling Frequency on Statistical Measurements of Turbulent Axisymmetric Jets

2020· article· en· W3021872898 on OpenAlex
Masoud Moeini, Babak Khorsandi, Laurent Mydlarski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydraulic Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbulenceReynolds numberPhysicsDoppler effectAcousticsNoise (video)Frequency domainVelocimetrySampling (signal processing)MechanicsStatisticsMathematicsOpticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acoustic Doppler velocimeters (ADVs) are used extensively in various field and laboratory studies of hydraulic engineering. However, their accuracy in predicting statistics of turbulence quantities has been questioned. Two fundamental limitations of this type of velocimeter are Doppler noise and the damping of fluctuations due to the temporal averaging performed by the instrument. An important factor that may affect both error sources is the sampling frequency of the ADV. An experimental investigation of the effect of the ADV sampling frequency on the measurement of both the mean and the high-order statistics of the flow in a turbulent jet was conducted. The experiments were carried out in the self-similar zone of an axisymmetric nonbuoyant jet at a Reynolds number of 10,000 released into quiescent water. Measurements of the mean and RMS velocities, spectra, and Reynolds shear stresses at different sampling frequencies are presented. Results were compared with those of other measurement techniques and interpreted using a novel analytical model quantifying the noise and the damping effect on the basis of their nonvanishing statistical correlation in the postaveraging domain, as well as the ratio of the flow’s integral timescale to the sampling interval. The damping effect at high sampling frequencies was eliminated using a hypothesis of proportionality of a relative change in the correlation coefficient to a change in the noise variance, provided that the integral timescale is adequately larger than the sampling interval. The proposed precision-enhancement technique (referred to herein as denoising and reverse-damping transformation) was shown to improve the accuracy of velocity variances. The results and model offer an opportunity to improve the precision of ADV measurements in turbulent flows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it