MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Predictive Control of Multichannel Boost Converter and VSI-Based Six-Phase PMSG Wind Energy Systems with Fixed Switching Frequency

2020· article· en· W3021900449 on OpenAlexaff
Kristiyan Milev, Venkata Yaramasu, Apparao Dekka, Samir Kouro

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Boost converterWind powerInductorAC powerRectifier (neural networks)Permanent magnet synchronous generatorModel predictive controlMaximum power point trackingPower controlEngineeringVoltageComputer sciencePower (physics)InverterElectrical engineeringPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simple and efficient model predictive control technique for a six-phase permanent magnet synchronous generator-based wind energy system with fixed switching frequency is presented in this paper. The power converter interface to the grid features a dual diode-bridge rectifier, followed by a three-channel (3C) boost converter and a two-channel grid-tied voltage source inverter (2C-VSI). The proposed control technique is divided into two decoupled and independent control loops: the first corresponds to a deadbeat current control for the 3C-boost converter, while the second is a modulated model predictive current control for the 2C-VSI. The maximum power point tracking is achieved through the regulation of inductor currents of 3C-boost converter, whereas the 2C-VSI is in charge of grid active and reactive power control with excellent power quality. The proposed control techniques ensure fixed switching frequency and interleaved operation for the 3C-boost converter and 2C-VSI under a wide dynamic range, leading to less steady-state errors and fast transient response with effective distribution of power among the channels. To evaluate the proposed control technique, dynamic simulation results are presented for a 1.5 MW commercial wind turbine under varying wind speed conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207