Testicular tumors in children and adolescents: long-term endocrine and fertility issues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The treatment modalities for testicular tumors (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy), have different associated gonadotoxic risks and the overall survival for most pediatric patients with testicular tumors is very good. However, necessary treatments may lead to the development of lasting gonadal dysfunction and subsequent negative health and quality of life impact. Research with long-term follow-up for patients who have undergone surgery as the sole treatment modality for testicular tumors in childhood are lacking. It is currently unclear if surgery leads to long-term negative functional outcomes. Alkylating agents (e.g., cyclophosphamide) have long been known to increase risk of infertility; platinum-based therapies used frequently for patients with germ-cell tumors (GCTs) also seem to carry some risk of gonadotoxicity, although they have not been as well studied. Radiotherapy to the gonads is toxic and Leydig cells are particularly sensitive to high doses of radiation (>12 Gy). Long-term fertility and hormonal impact vary based on the patient's age, as well as the type and intensity of the oncological treatment prescribed. Counselling regarding fertility risk and preservation options should ideally take place before initiating potentially gonadotoxic treatments. Hypogonadism in peri-pubertal boys can present as delayed onset or failure to progress through puberty. Sperm cryopreservation should be offered for post-pubertal boys who are able to provide a semen sample. For prepubertal boys or young males who cannot provide a semen sample, only experimental options are currently available. Much of the data reviewed here is extrapolated from research done on adult males whose reproductive and hormonal outcomes may not be comparable to younger patients who do not yet have fully developed reproductive systems. Currently, a lack of good quality evidence in this age range causes this restriction to be unavoidable. Patients and their families want to be informed of the risks and treatment options for preserving testicular function. As research continues in this field, it grows more important for urologists to be aware of the outcomes and options for their patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".