MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3021927270 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201401152

Effect of Heavy Oil Reservoir Rock Texture on the Vp/Vs Ratios Derived from Logs

2010· article· en· W3021927270 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carmen C. Dumitrescu, Laurence R. Lines

Bibliographic record

Venue72nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2010 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTexture (cosmology)GeologyPetroleum engineeringComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Well logs are considered by geophysicists as “hard data” for seismic reservoir characterization. In the last few years, lots of wells have been drilled for heavy oil delineation in different fields. Also, many core samples were measured in the laboratory and a wide scattering of velocity within heavy oil sand was observed (Han et al., 2007). Some of the factors controlling the velocities in heavy oil sands are: rock texture, pore fluid properties and the interaction between pore fluids and the rock frame at different temperatures. All of these have been investigated by laboratory measurements. In this paper we analyze and investigate the effect of rock texture on Vp/Vs ratio from well logs in two different heavy oil reservoirs located in the Athabasca basin in northern Alberta, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue72nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2010→Same topicDrilling and Well Engineering→French-language works237,207→