MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021933353 · doi:10.3917/lap.022.0001

Roland Pressat, un démographe éminent de l’équipe d’Alfred Sauvy

2020· article· fr· W3021933353 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean‐Paul Sardon, Chantal Blayo

Bibliographic record

VenueLes analyses de Population & Avenir · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtAmateurGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Roland Pressat (1923-2020) est un éminent représentant des chercheurs forgés dans « l’esprit Sauvy ». Sens de la rigueur, qualités de plume et goût pour la vulgarisation. Sa contribution à la diffusion de l’analyse démographique fut considérable et de nombreux démographes, à travers tous les continents, lui doivent leur formation, tant par son enseignement, à Paris et à Montréal, que par ses ouvrages. Son innovation pédagogique fut la création de « devoirs » comme apprentissage à la recherche. Homme de passion, il était également collectionneur de gravures, amateur de vins et de cigares.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes analyses de Population & AvenirSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207