A collocation-based multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree method using mode combination and improved relaxation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although very useful, the original multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) method has two weaknesses: (1) its cost scales exponentially with the number of atoms in the system; (2) the standard MCTDH implementation requires that the potential energy surface (PES) be in the sum-of-product (SOP) form in order to reduce the cost of computing integrals in the MCTDH basis. One way to deal with (1) is to lump coordinates into groups. This is mode combination (MC). One way to deal with (2) is to reformulate MCTDH using collocation so that there are no integrals. In this paper, we combine MC and collocation to formulate a MC collocation multi-configuration time-dependent Hartree (MC-C-MCTDH) method. In practice, its cost does not scale exponentially with the number of atoms, and it can be used with any general PES; the PES need not be an SOP and need not have a special form. No integrals and, hence, no quadratures are necessary. We demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the new method by computing vibrational energy eigenstates of methyl radical, methane, and acetonitrile. To do this, we use MC-C-MCTDH with a variant of improved relaxation, derived by evaluating a residual at points. Because the MC basis functions are multivariate, collocation points in multi-dimensional spaces are required. We use two types of collocation points: (1) discrete variable representation-like points obtained from (approximate) simultaneous diagonalization of matrices and (2) Leja points, which are known to be good interpolation points, determined from a generalized recipe suitable for any basis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".