MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021992093 · doi:10.1093/res/hgaa032

Hamlet and Character in Modernist Criticism

2020· article· en· W3021992093 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nathan Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Review of English Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHAMLET (protein complex)Character (mathematics)MetanarrativeKnightLiteratureTeleologyNarrativeTragedy (event)PhilosophyCriticismContext (archaeology)ArtEpistemologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article is a critical history of the conflict over the ‘living character’, especially in the context of the debates over Hamlet between A. C. Bradley, T. S. Eliot and G. Wilson Knight. I argue that Bradley is a nuanced critic, who, far from seeing Hamlet as merely the imitation of a real person, recognizes the role of the reader in filling narrative gaps, smoothing over inconsistencies, and ultimately accepting the incompleteness of the text. I argue that Eliot and Wilson Knight, who attack Hamlet’s character in their writings, should be understood as engaged in the deliberate construction of a teleological metanarrative that presents the destabilized modernist character as the natural culmination of literary history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Review of English StudiesSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207