Endokinin A/B stimulates rat gastric motility through myogenic NK1 receptors located in the fundus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Endokinin A/B (EKA/B), the common C-terminal decapeptide in endokinins A and B, is a preferred ligand of the NK1 receptor and regulates pain and itch. The study focused on the effects of EKA/B on rat gastric motility in vivo and in vitro. Gastric emptying was measured to evaluate gastric motility in vivo. Intragastric pressure and the contraction of gastric muscle strips were measured to evaluate gastric motility in vitro. Moreover, various neural blocking agents and neurokinin receptor antagonists were applied to explore the mechanisms. TAC4 and TACR1 mRNAs were expressed throughout rat stomach. EKA/B promoted gastric emptying by intraperitoneal injection in vivo. Correspondingly, EKA/B also increased intragastric pressure in vitro. Additionally, EKA/B contracted the gastric muscle strips from the fundus but not from the corpus or antrum. Further studies revealed that the contraction induced by EKA/B on muscle strips from the fundus could be significantly reduced by NK1 receptor antagonist SR140333 but not by NK2 receptor antagonist, NK3 receptor antagonist, or the neural blocking agents used. Our results suggested that EKA/B might stimulate gastric motility mainly through the direct activation of myogenic NK1 receptors located in the fundus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".