MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022057548

Physical simulations of seabed scouring by ice: review and database

2012· article· en· W3022057548 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Paul Barrette, Denise Sudom

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersCold Regions Research and Engineering LaboratoryDeltaresMemorial University of Newfoundland
KeywordsSeabedGeologySea iceDatabaseOceanographyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper summarizes the compilation of information on physical simulations of seabed scouring by ice keels, and the resulting database. Physical simulations are critical for a proper understanding of ice scouring phenomena. A total of 487 scour simulations from twentyeight studies are reported. General information about test facility, soil, keel type, model pipeline, test conditions and results are outlined. The database can be used as a tool to identify knowledge gaps and guide future testing programs, to generate empirical relationships between the parameters involved during this interaction, or to validate numerical models. Copyright © 2012 by the International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers (ISOPE).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207