Semiparametric Inference of the Youden Index and the Optimal Cutoff Point under Density Ratio Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Youden index is a popular summary statistic for receiver operating characteristic curve. It gives the optimal cutoff point of a biomarker to distinguish the diseased and healthy individuals. In this paper, we propose to model the distributions of a biomarker for individuals in the healthy and diseased groups via a semiparametric density ratio model. Based on this model, we use the maximum empirical likelihood method to estimate the Youden index and the optimal cutoff point. We further establish the asymptotic normality of the proposed estimators and construct valid confidence intervals for the Youden index and the corresponding optimal cutoff point. The proposed method automatically covers both cases when there is no lower limit of detection (LLOD) and when there is a fixed and finite LLOD for the biomarker. Extensive simulation studies and a real data example are used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method and its advantages over the existing methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it