MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022080415 · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.780

P716 HIV prevalence in at-risk adolescent girls and young women in kenya across locations associated with sex work

2019· article· en· W3022080415 on OpenAlexaff
Marissa Becker, Helgar Musyoki, Sharmistha Mishra, Parinita Bhattacharjee, Eve Cheuk, Stella Leung, Robert Lorway, Shajy Isac, Peter Gichangi, François Cholette, Paul Sandstrom, James Blanchard, Michael Pickles

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsInternational Centre for Infectious DiseasesSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of ManitobaManitoba Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransactional sexDemographyCasualSex workMedicineCross-sectional studyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Environmental healthPopulationImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> HIV prevalence is influenced by biological, behavioural and structural factors. We sought to understand HIV prevalence among at-risk adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Kenya and the relative importance of location and subgroup. <h3>Methods</h3> We conducted a cross-sectional survey among AGYW aged 14–24 years in Mombasa, Kenya in 2015/16. Using probabilistic sampling we recruited participants from hotspots where female sex workers (FSWs) solicit clients, divided into venue-based (bars/brothels/hotels/brew dens) and non-venue-based (streets/public places) hotspots. We measured HIV prevalence using dried blood spot serology testing and examined predictors of risk including subgroup: engagement in formal sex work; transactional sex (TS) (exchange of sex for goods/money without pre-negotiation of price); and casual sex (CS) (did not self-identify as FSW or engaging in TS). We compared determinants of risk in venue-based and non-venue-based participants after adjusting for age. <h3>Results</h3> Overall HIV prevalence was 5.6%, with highest prevalence among FSWs (10.1%), compared to those engaged in TS (3.6%) or CS (3.6%) (p &lt; 0.001). Daily/almost daily alcohol use was associated with higher prevalence in both venue- (AOR 2.8 (1.3–6.1)) and non-venue-based (AOR 5.3 (1.3–21.1)) hotspots. Venue-based participants were also more likely to test positive if they had ever been pregnant [AOR 1.9 (1.0–3.5)], had their first sexual experience aged &lt;15 years [AOR2.2 (1.2–4.1)] or had ever experienced sexual [AOR 3.2 (1.8–5.7)] or physical violence [AOR 2.4 (1.3–4.3)]. Compared to CS and TS, HIV prevalence was higher among FSWs in venue-based hotspots [AOR3.4 (1.8–6.3)], but not non-venues [AOR 1.1 (0.3–3.8)]. <h3>Conclusion</h3> We identified a high prevalence of HIV among AGYW congregating in hotspots for FSW, with heterogeneity across subgroups. Determinants of HIV varied by location suggesting that one’s environment is an important contributor to risk, and HIV programmes should take this into consideration for designing delivery of interventions. <h3>Disclosure</h3> No significant relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicSex work and related issuesFrench-language works237,207