L' influence de la littérature française d'Oïl sur l'oeuvre de Boccace : contribution à l'intertextualité médiévale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans les œuvres du jeune Boccace on trouve entre autres de nombreuses references a la litterature francaise et notamment a celle du nord de la France ecrite en langue d’Oil. L’auteur italien a ainsi participe au phenomene d’intertextualite et a sa propagation au Moyen Age. Ce travail est base sur trois œuvres de jeunesse de Boccace, chacune d’entre elles etant confrontee a son principal modele francais (Filocolo et Conte de Floire et Blancheflor-Filostrato et Roman de Troie – Amorosa Visione et Roman de la Rose). Les trois etudes comparatives ainsi etablies permettent de definir quels sont les elements narratifs et structurels de la litterature francaise dont Boccace s’est le plus inspire dans ses œuvres. Elles demontrent egalement la volonte de l’auteur italien de se detacher de ses sources et les moyens utilises a cet effet ; cette emancipation lui ayant permis d’affirmer son potentiel de creativite et d’acquerir la reconnaissance en tant qu’ecrivain et poete.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".