Archival Activism, Symbolic Annihilation, and the LGBTQ2+ Community Archive
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
LGBTQ2+ community archives, often founded in the 1970s and 1980s, are no longer necessarily outside the archival mainstream from the perspective of non-white, and non-cis LGBTQ2+ people.Histories of whiteness, settlercolonialism, and cisnormativity within the LGBTQ2+ community archive can create the "symbolic annihilation" of trans and Black, Indigenous, and people of colour (BIPOC) histories within the queer community archive, if left unaddressed.Our current moment requires an active reimagining of what activism means within legacy LGBTQ2+ community, activist archives.This article describes my efforts, as a volunteer and board member at the ArQuives and as the director of the LGBTQ2+ Oral History Digital Collaboratory, to help bring an intersectional, trans-inclusive framework to an LGBTQ2+ community archive with origins in Canada's gay liberation movement.The Collaboratory is a five-year digital history research collaboration, funded by Canada's Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, that connects archives across Canada and the United States to produce a collaborative digital history hub for the research and study of gay, lesbian, queer, and trans oral histories.We have four archival partners: the ArQuives (formerly the Canadian Lesbian and Gay Archives); the Digital Transgender Archive; the Transgender Archives at the University of Victoria; and the Archives of Lesbian Oral Testimony.In this article, I focus on the Collaboratory's efforts to bring trans visibility to the ArQuives' collections. 1 I would like to thank the anonymous readers for their excellent recommendations on this piece, as well as Cait McKinney, Rebecka Sheffield, Raegan Swanson, and Ed Jackson for their insightful comments.Thanks as well to
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it