MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022195161 · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.863

P817 Longitudinal associations between recent incarceration and STI/HIV risk: the role of prior trauma in exacerbating risk

2019· article· en· W3022195161 on OpenAlexaff
Kailyn E. Young, Willem F. van der Mei, Joy D. Scheidell, Typhanye V. Dyer, Christopher Hucks‐Ortiz, Russell Brewer, MacRegga Severe, Andrea B. Troxel, Jay S. Kaufman, Maria R. Khan

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRelative riskDemographyGonorrheaPoisson regressionConfidence intervalMen who have sex with menSyphilisHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PsychiatryInternal medicineEnvironmental healthPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) disproportionately report a history of traumatic life events including incarceration. Incarceration, by increasing distress and psychopathology, may increase risk-taking and infection. Pre-incarceration trauma may exacerbate the impact of incarceration on STI/HIV risk among BMSM. <h3>Methods</h3> Using data from HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 061, we used inverse probability of treatment weighted Poisson regression models to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between recent incarceration and incident STI (gonorrhea, chlamydia, and syphilis) and sexual risk behavior (sex trade defined as selling/buying sex, multiple partnerships, condomless sex) measured six months after incarceration assessment (n=1189). We tested the significance of interaction terms between incarceration and trauma to assess whether associations differed significantly by trauma history (e.g., experiencing a robbery, natural disaster, sexual/physical assault). <h3>Results</h3> Approximately 93% reported at least one traumatic event and 14% had been recently incarcerated. Incarceration was associated with STI among those with prior trauma (RR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00–1.22) but not among those with no prior trauma (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.75–1.09); associations differed significantly (interaction term p=0.036). Incarceration was linked to increased risk of sex trade involvement among those with prior trauma (RR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.00–1.15) and decreased risk among those with no prior trauma (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.90–1.00) (interaction term p=0.002). Incarceration was associated with increased risk of multiple partnerships among those with prior trauma (RR: 1.24; CI: 1.10, 1.40) but not among those with no prior trauma (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.32–2.25), though the RRs were not significantly different (interaction term p=0.224). Incarceration was not associated with condomless sex, regardless of prior trauma. <h3>Conclusion</h3> BMSM with prior trauma appear to face disproportionate vulnerability to STI/HIV risk after release from incarceration. Trauma-informed STI/HIV care and prevention interventions for BMSM with recent justice involvement are warranted. <h3>Disclosure</h3> No significant relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207