← all works
Reply to Letter to the Editor
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
stratum: aff_core · design weight: 5595.24 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: editorial/commentary
about Canada: no
confidence: low
A clinical reply to a letter to the editor in pediatric surgery; correspondence on a clinical topic, not research practice.
GPT-5.6 (high)T3 · adjacent, not in scope
genre: editorial/commentary
about Canada: no
confidence: high
It is a reply to a letter, a contextual scholarly communication item rather than an analytic study.
Grok 4.5OUT
genre: other
about Canada: no
confidence: low
Bare reply letter with no abstract or topic text; cannot establish a metaresearch object.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Surgery
- Topic
- Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
- Funders
- Academy of Medical SciencesNational Institute for Health and Care Research
- Keywords
- MedicinePyloromyotomyScopusGeneral surgeryClinical significancePerforationPyloric stenosisStatistical significanceHypertrophic Pyloric StenosisMEDLINESurgeryInternal medicinePylorus
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no