MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022302299 · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.763

P697 Feasibility of HPV self-collection for cervix screening in under-screened street entrenched women

2019· article· en· W3022302299 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Northern British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCervixColposcopyCervical screeningObstetricsGynecologyPopulationMedical recordOutpatient clinicFamily medicineCervical cancerInternal medicineEnvironmental healthCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> HPV self-collection is a promising approach to improve uptake of cervical screening in under-screened women. The aim of this feasibility study was to measure uptake of HPV self-collection, HPV positivity, and screening history of street entrenched women in a rural region centre. <h3>Methods</h3> Women 30–69 years of age, attending drop-in community-based primary care and integrative reproductive health clinics in Northern British Columbia (BC), Canada and self-reported not having received cervix screening in the last 3 years, were offered self-collection for HPV testing. A convenience sample of all comers was administered a questionnaire and underwent a medical chart review, including the provincial cervix screening registry. Demographics, HIV status, and cervix screening history were collected. All women who tested HPV16/18 positive were referred for colposcopy. <h3>Results</h3> A total of 66 eligible women were analyzed (mean age 43.3 years), with population saturation reached after 3 months recruitment. An additional 11 women were deemed ineligible due to age or prior hysterectomy. 83% self-reported as Indigenous. Based on the provincial cervix screening registry, 48% of women were up-to-date on cervix screening based on triennial screening guidelines. All women undertook self-collection and the majority of women reported high perceived acceptability, safety, and accuracy of HPV self-collection. HPV 16/18 positivity was 7.6%, with 40% co-infected with HIV. Overall HIV prevalence was 16.4%, however, over 25% of women had unknown HIV status based on medical chart review. <h3>Conclusion</h3> HPV self-collection was highly acceptable as part of community-based integrative reproductive health services. Despite being a traditionally underserved population, and women self-reporting being overdue for screening, over half the women were up to date on cervix screening, albeit regular screening was lacking for many. The findings from this feasibility study will inform future implementation of HPV self-collection to improve and maintain regular cervix screening services in street entrenched women. <h3>Disclosure</h3> No significant relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it