Facies associations and depositional environments of a mixed siliciclastic-carbonate marginal marine succession: The Lower Carnian (Upper Triassic) middle Charlie Lake Formation, Kobes-Blueberry area, British Columbia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Upper Triassic (Carnian) Charlie Lake Formation in northeastern British Columbia, Canada is a heterolithic mixed siliciclastic-carbonate succession of dolomite dolomitic siltstone, well-sorted sandstone, bioclastic sandstone, and anhydrite. This succession is unusual in that it records the only significant non-marine interval in the Triassic of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. In the Kobes-Altares-Blueberry area, moderately abundant core are available through the middle members of the Charlie Lake Formation. All available core were analyzed in order to interpret the depositional setting of constituent members and identify reservoir quality lithofacies and horizons. The middle Charlie Lake Formation in the Kobes-Altares-Blueberry area was deposited in an arid coastal setting. Sixteen lithofacies were identified and placed in three lithofacies assemblages and the latter characterize three depositional settings: coastal salina/playa, aeolian dune, and proximal marine ramps. The coastal salina/playa lithofacies assemblage is heterolithic, and is dominated by dolomitic and anhydritic facies. Depositional subenvironments include intertidal flat, ephemeral lagoon, shore proximal ephemeral lake, sabkha and supratidal paleosol. Potential reservoir lithofacies in this assemblage includes peloidal to stromatolitic dolomitic siltstone deposited in lagoonal and intertidal flat settings. The aeolian dune lithofacies assemblage preserves the movement of small, shore-proximal dunes and associated interdune successions. Well-sorted, fine-grained sandstone beds comprise the best reservoir lithofacies in this assemblage. The proximal marine ramp facies assemblage records several marine transgressions that punctuate the dominantly nonmarine/marginal marine Charlie Lake Formation. Bioclastic packstone, bioclastic sandstone and peloidal dolomitic siltstone to sandstone beds, all exhibit good porosity and are potential hydrocarbon reservoir units within this lithofacies assemblage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".