A Little Bit More: Bitplane-Wise Bit-Depth Recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Imaging sensors digitize incoming scene light at a dynamic range of 10-12 bits (i.e., 1024-4096 tonal values). The sensor image is then processed onboard the camera and finally quantized to only 8 bits (i.e., 256 tonal values) to conform to prevailing encoding standards. There are a number of important applications, such as high-bit-depth displays and photo editing, where it is beneficial to recover the lost bit depth. Deep neural networks are effective at this bit-depth reconstruction task. Given the quantized low-bit-depth image as input, existing deep learning methods employ a single-shot approach that attempts to either (1) directly estimate the high-bit-depth image, or (2) directly estimate the residual between the high- and low-bit-depth images. In contrast, we propose a training and inference strategy that recovers the residual image bitplane-by-bitplane. Our bitplane-wise learning framework has the advantage of allowing for multiple levels of supervision during training and is able to obtain state-of-the-art results using a simple network architecture. We test our proposed method extensively on several image datasets and demonstrate an improvement from 0.5dB to 2.3dB PSNR over prior methods depending on the quantization level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".