MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022325505 · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3125692

A Little Bit More: Bitplane-Wise Bit-Depth Recovery

2021· preprint· en· W3022325505 on OpenAlexaff
Abhijith Punnappurath, Michael S. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidualComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceQuantization (signal processing)Encoding (memory)Color depthImage (mathematics)Bit (key)Deep learningBitstreamComputer visionAlgorithmDecoding methodsImage processingColor image

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Imaging sensors digitize incoming scene light at a dynamic range of 10-12 bits (i.e., 1024-4096 tonal values). The sensor image is then processed onboard the camera and finally quantized to only 8 bits (i.e., 256 tonal values) to conform to prevailing encoding standards. There are a number of important applications, such as high-bit-depth displays and photo editing, where it is beneficial to recover the lost bit depth. Deep neural networks are effective at this bit-depth reconstruction task. Given the quantized low-bit-depth image as input, existing deep learning methods employ a single-shot approach that attempts to either (1) directly estimate the high-bit-depth image, or (2) directly estimate the residual between the high- and low-bit-depth images. In contrast, we propose a training and inference strategy that recovers the residual image bitplane-by-bitplane. Our bitplane-wise learning framework has the advantage of allowing for multiple levels of supervision during training and is able to obtain state-of-the-art results using a simple network architecture. We test our proposed method extensively on several image datasets and demonstrate an improvement from 0.5dB to 2.3dB PSNR over prior methods depending on the quantization level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine IntelligenceSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207