Recent Advances in the Design and Architecture of Bioelectrochemical Systems to Treat Wastewater and to Produce Choice-Based Byproducts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Production of valuable chemicals and fuels using bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) from low-valued solids, liquid, and gaseous wastes has gained enormous attention among scientific communities. For example, a microbial fuel cell can produce bioelectricity using wastewater as substrate in anode and oxygen as oxidant in cathode. Partial desalination of sea water can be achieved in microbial desalination cells using the potential difference between the anode and cathode as a driving force. More interestingly, the microbial electrosynthesis cell is capable of producing organic acids, alcohols, methane, and bioplastics using CO2 (a major greenhouse gas) as sole carbon feedstock. However, these technologies are still in the growing phase—mostly validated in lab-scale studies and, thus, yet to find position among field-scale prototypes. The fabrication details, main output, and various glitches during the bioconversion, where there is scope for further development, are outlined systematically. This manuscript provides a bird’s-eye view of all the different categories of BES, which will be helpful for the beginners of this field of research to understand the topic more clearly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".