The Impact of Nimodipine Administration through Feeding Tube on Outcomes in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and vasospasm are the main challenges contributing to unfavorable outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Nimodipine has been shown to decrease the incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia and improve outcomes. In patients who are unable to swallow, nimodipine tablets are crushed and administered through enteral feeding tubes. However, it is not clear whether this may result in reduced clinical effectiveness. The aims of the study were to investigate the impact of nimodipine administration through enteral feeding tubes, in the first 7 days and over the 21-days period on patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of subarachnoid hemorrhage patients admitted at the University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada was carried out. Logistic regression modelling was utilized to identify predictors of vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia. Main outcome measures were angiographic evidence of moderate to severe vasospasm, development of delayed cerebral ischemia and hospital mortality. RESULTS: 85 patients were included. Following adjustment for disease severity, nimodipine administration technique was associated with vasospasm in the first 7 days of patient admission where patients receiving nimodipine via enteral feeding tubes had increased odds of vasospasm compared to those administered it as whole tablets (OR 8.9, 95% CI 1.1-73.1, p value 0.042). When analyzed over the 21-day period, nimodipine administration by feeding tube was associated with increased odds of DCI compared to whole tablets (OR 38.1, 95% CI 1.4-1067.9, p value 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that nimodipine administration via enteral feeding tubes may be associated with vasospasm and DCI in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients secondary to reduced exposure. Prospective studies are needed to confirm such association and alternate methods of administration should be explored to ensure patients are getting the benefits of nimodipine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".