MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022363892 · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.815

P757 An evaluation of the provincial ‘syphistory’ campaign in british columbia, canada

2019· article· en· W3022363892 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsBC Centre for Disease Control
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Infectious syphilis rates have been increasing in British Columbia (BC), Canada, primarily among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM). In response, a provincial syphilis campaign (“Syphistory”) was launched in January 2017, and included posters in venues frequented by gbMSM (physical and online) and a campaign-specific educational website. Goals of the campaign were to increase knowledge of syphilis and syphilis screening. <h3>Methods</h3> Website metrics were collected and analyzed via Piwik Analytics tool. Pre and post-campaign surveys were conducted to assess knowledge of syphilis using a convenience sample of clients attending STI clinics in the Vancouver area. One-sided t-tests were used to analyze change in knowledge scores. Interrupted time series analysis was conducted to assess the change in syphilis screening rate among males before versus on or after January 2017. <h3>Results</h3> During 2017 there were 4,421 unique visitors to the Syphistory educational website, of which 71% were between February and April. Mean survey score pre-campaign was 8.96/12 (n=137) and 9.12/12 (n=266) post-campaign (p=0.223). Those who reported seeing the campaign demonstrated a greater knowledge of syphilis (mean 9.7/12 versus 8.9/12, p&lt;0.001). Provincial syphilis testing volumes among males were 93,311 and 101,967 in the 12 months before and after campaign implementation, respectively. Adjusting for the historical trend of increasing syphilis screening, there was a statistically significant change in syphilis testing rate among males (p=0.03). <h3>Conclusion</h3> Our campaign appeared to have reached people living in BC. Syphilis knowledge was high in our pre-campaign sample, which may represent a more educated cohort. Nevertheless, those who saw the campaign scored higher. Syphilis testing rate among males increased significantly after campaign implementation. Work is underway to evaluate the campaign among gbMSM. <h3>Disclosure</h3> No significant relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it