MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022363892 · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.815

P757 An evaluation of the provincial ‘syphistory’ campaign in british columbia, canada

2019· article· en· W3022363892 on OpenAlexaffabout
Venessa Ryan, Emma Cumming, Devon Haag, Joshua Edward, Michael Otterstatter, Troy Grennan, Jillian Arkles Schwandt, Bobbi Brownrigg, Mark Gilbert, Jason Wong

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsBC Centre for Disease Control
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Infectious syphilis rates have been increasing in British Columbia (BC), Canada, primarily among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM). In response, a provincial syphilis campaign (“Syphistory”) was launched in January 2017, and included posters in venues frequented by gbMSM (physical and online) and a campaign-specific educational website. Goals of the campaign were to increase knowledge of syphilis and syphilis screening. Methods Website metrics were collected and analyzed via Piwik Analytics tool. Pre and post-campaign surveys were conducted to assess knowledge of syphilis using a convenience sample of clients attending STI clinics in the Vancouver area. One-sided t-tests were used to analyze change in knowledge scores. Interrupted time series analysis was conducted to assess the change in syphilis screening rate among males before versus on or after January 2017. Results During 2017 there were 4,421 unique visitors to the Syphistory educational website, of which 71% were between February and April. Mean survey score pre-campaign was 8.96/12 (n=137) and 9.12/12 (n=266) post-campaign (p=0.223). Those who reported seeing the campaign demonstrated a greater knowledge of syphilis (mean 9.7/12 versus 8.9/12, p<0.001). Provincial syphilis testing volumes among males were 93,311 and 101,967 in the 12 months before and after campaign implementation, respectively. Adjusting for the historical trend of increasing syphilis screening, there was a statistically significant change in syphilis testing rate among males (p=0.03). Conclusion Our campaign appeared to have reached people living in BC. Syphilis knowledge was high in our pre-campaign sample, which may represent a more educated cohort. Nevertheless, those who saw the campaign scored higher. Syphilis testing rate among males increased significantly after campaign implementation. Work is underway to evaluate the campaign among gbMSM. Disclosure No significant relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207