MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3022470581 · doi:10.1144/sp503-2020-6

A slab failure origin for the Donegal composite batholith, Ireland as indicated by trace-element geochemistry

2020· article· en· W3022470581 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Donnelly B. Archibald, J. Brendan Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBatholithGeologyGeochemistrySlabTrace elementComposite numberSeismologyPaleontologyMaterials scienceComposite materialTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Silurian–early Devonian Donegal composite batholith of Ireland is a classic composite batholith that intruded Neoproterozoic Dalradian metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks during and after the Scandian phase ( c. 435–425 Ma) of the Caledonian Orogeny. The Scandian phase is widely attributed to the collision of Baltica, Ganderia and Avalonia with Laurentia during closure of the Iapetus Ocean. Isotopic and lithogeochemical data indicate episodic construction of the composite batholith from c. 430–400 Ma. The granitoid rocks are enriched in large-ion lithophile elements, such as Cs, Rb and Ba, and are depleted in high field strength (Nb, Ta, P and Ti) and heavy rare-earth elements. In particular, the chemistry of granitoid rocks from the Donegal composite batholith has Nb/Y >0.4, La/Yb >10, Sm/Yb >2.5 and Gd/Yb >2.0. These characteristics are compatible with a slab-failure origin for the batholith. Following collision, the Iapetus Ocean slab severed by detaching from the trailing continental crust. Upwelling asthenosphere filled the void and the advected heat melted the subcontinental lithospheric mantle and/or the base of the crust to generate the magmas that formed the Donegal composite batholith. The trace-element data indicate melt derivation from processes that left behind a garnet-bearing, plagioclase-absent residue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207